Some on TAM argue that exposure of or revenge on the POSOM/W is wrong, because they owe you nothing, it is all down to your WS. It's all the fault of your WS.
That is not true.
Let's use an analogy.
Let's suppose that you are a police officer dealing with a business where a member of staff has been suborned into helping a con artist steal millions of $£ from the business.
Imagine your anger when the boss refuses to prosecute the con man, but only wants to prosecute his/her member of staff because "The con man owes me nothing but my employee is under contract to me so I will only prosecute them! "
It would be an utterly mad decision, as mad as punishing your WS but NOT punishing the POSOM/W!
Posted via Mobile Device
That is not true.
Let's use an analogy.
Let's suppose that you are a police officer dealing with a business where a member of staff has been suborned into helping a con artist steal millions of $£ from the business.
Imagine your anger when the boss refuses to prosecute the con man, but only wants to prosecute his/her member of staff because "The con man owes me nothing but my employee is under contract to me so I will only prosecute them! "
It would be an utterly mad decision, as mad as punishing your WS but NOT punishing the POSOM/W!
Posted via Mobile Device