Oh, for Pete's Sake! - Page 3 - Talk About Marriage
Coping with Infidelity Relationship recovery from the destructiveness of infidelity.

User Tag List

 135Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
post #31 of 72 (permalink) Old 03-11-2017, 07:46 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 6,304
Re: Oh, for Pete's Sake!

Quote:
Originally Posted by LosingHim View Post
Website is blocked at work - cliffnotes?


But they don't block TAM?

225985 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 72 (permalink) Old 03-11-2017, 07:47 AM
Member
 
2ntnuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 13,989
Re: Oh, for Pete's Sake!

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucy999 View Post
Im a recovering mormon. Curious, why do you think this?
I thought it was humorous. If I have to explain it, it won't be.

"I'm significant!! Screamed the dust speck." - Bill Watterson

"And this, too, shall pass away."
2ntnuf is offline  
post #33 of 72 (permalink) Old 03-11-2017, 10:27 AM
Moderator
 
MattMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: England
Posts: 19,197
Re: Oh, for Pete's Sake!

Moderator Notice:

Let's keep this on topic, please, OK?

http://mygeneralblog1.blogspot.co.uk
http://mygeneralblog1.blogspot.co.uk...-cheaters.html (Be afraid UK cheaters! CheaterVille has come to the UK!
MattMatt is online now  
 
post #34 of 72 (permalink) Old 03-11-2017, 10:32 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 1,456
Re: Oh, for Pete's Sake!

Sure thing @MattMatt

What's the topic?
browser is offline  
post #35 of 72 (permalink) Old 03-11-2017, 11:07 AM
Member
 
lostmyreligion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 239
Re: Oh, for Pete's Sake!

Quote:
Originally Posted by 225985 View Post
How do you all read multiple sites? I can barely keep up with TAM.
Evelyn Wood, a fast laptop/connection, and a two hour block of time in the very early morning, before work, when I can unplug from life and indulge my inner info pig.

"If you can keep your head while all those about you are losing theirs, then perhaps you have misunderstood the situation." - Daniel Keys Moran - from The Long Run

You don't really own anything you can't hold onto at a dead run... -Anonymous-
lostmyreligion is offline  
post #36 of 72 (permalink) Old 03-11-2017, 11:44 AM
Member
 
Spicy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Depends on time of year
Posts: 707
Re: Oh, for Pete's Sake!

I guess I just have to accept that no matter how much I can try to put myself in someone else's shoes in the attempt to get a different perspective, and in hopes of understanding others better, there are things I have to realize about my own limitations in this ability.

There are shoes like these...that are so beyond nasty, I can't even stand to see them from multiple states away, let alone try them on to understand...

Ciao,

Spicy
Spicy is offline  
post #37 of 72 (permalink) Old 03-11-2017, 11:50 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
bandit.45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 17,429
Re: Oh, for Pete's Sake!

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2ntnuf View Post
I thought it was humorous. If I have to explain it, it won't be.
Mmmm....not really cool man.

If you are going to poke fun at a religion, make fun of the Amish...because they will never read it.
bandit.45 is offline  
post #38 of 72 (permalink) Old 03-11-2017, 12:06 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,335
Re: Oh, for Pete's Sake!

Quote:
Originally Posted by bandit.45 View Post
Mmmm....not really cool man.

If you are going to poke fun at a religion, make fun of the Amish...because they will never read it.
kristin2349 is offline  
post #39 of 72 (permalink) Old 03-11-2017, 12:40 PM
Member
 
2ntnuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: PA
Posts: 13,989
Re: Oh, for Pete's Sake!

Quote:
Originally Posted by bandit.45 View Post
Mmmm....not really cool man.

If you are going to poke fun at a religion, make fun of the Amish...because they will never read it.

"I'm significant!! Screamed the dust speck." - Bill Watterson

"And this, too, shall pass away."
2ntnuf is offline  
post #40 of 72 (permalink) Old 03-11-2017, 05:12 PM
Member
 
LosingHim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Nowhere near where it's sunny enough to make me happy
Posts: 330
Re: Oh, for Pete's Sake!

Quote:
Originally Posted by 225985 View Post
But they don't block TAM?
Nope


I'll get through this, one day at a time.
LosingHim is offline  
post #41 of 72 (permalink) Old 03-11-2017, 05:55 PM
Member
 
MJJEAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: MI
Posts: 2,285
Re: Oh, for Pete's Sake!

The BS's both work away a LOT. They live next door to each other and share a yard. The BS's think they are all besties. They simply aren't suspicious due to the closeness of the relationship. It's really sad, actually.

Follow the evidence where it leads and question everything.
MJJEAN is offline  
post #42 of 72 (permalink) Old 03-11-2017, 07:43 PM
Member
 
Affaircare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 3,852
Affaircare is offline  
post #43 of 72 (permalink) Old 03-11-2017, 09:43 PM
Member
 
jsmart's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,031
Re: Oh, for Pete's Sake!

Quote:
Originally Posted by alte Dame View Post
She's trash. The thing that gets me, aside from the obvious, is that, as a long-term member of the site, other posters have to respond as if she is either sane or worth a respectful reply. "Sorry you're going through this." "(((HUGS)))"

Yeah, right.
Totally agree. I've read most of her threads and find her total lack of remorse toward not only her husband but also her "friend" so reprehensible.

But she's just one of many that are truly vile. The heavy handed moderation on that site ensures that their delicate sensibilities are not hurt. Don't want to cause a wayward to reflect on the carnage they're causing.

That section of LS is a true Bizaro world. Where the few dual homewreckers are like heroes that many wish to emulate. But the site allows people a glimpse into the dark heart of waywards. How so many WWs that are supposedly trying to R, still pine away for a man they know in retrospect only offered empty compliments that they rewarded with porn level sex but they still can't help themselves. Also how many are now disgusted by their BHs touch.

What's truly surprising is how many WWs would be willing to blow up their marriages and families for an OM that they truly barely know. It's only the fact that most MM are not as keen on abandoning their families that keeps them with their plan B husband.
jsmart is offline  
post #44 of 72 (permalink) Old 03-11-2017, 10:16 PM
Forum Supporter
 
Hope Shimmers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: US
Posts: 480
Re: Oh, for Pete's Sake!

LS has tried, for years, to keep two forums: one dedicated to the BS and one dedicated to the WS. What they did wrong, in my opinion, is allow cross-posting. Because it was not done equally. It is not just negative regarding the infidelity forum over there. The OW/OM forum there is so controversial; as an example, there is one poster there that has defined HIMSELF as such a hypocrite on BOTH forums, yet he is allowed to pontificate all over the place on the OM/OW forum. WTF.

To answer Gus' question, the head moderator there is an ex-(single) OM who was in many, MANY affairs with WWs in his past, and is quite direct, public, and frank in discussing those experiences. I'm not saying anything here that he has not voluntarily made public information, so this should be acceptable to repeat.

Moderation there is the worst. Inconsistent, spontaneously made-up rules, idiocy, emotional reactions versus rules, over many years - but worse during the last couple of years by far. The head moderator needs to go. Emotionally he has a hair-trigger. The owner would do well to fire him, and he would also have a much better internet traffic record because banning EVERYONE who you might possibly disagree with, over the course of many years, has seriously slowed down the internet traffic of that site. If I were the owner (who, by the way, disappeared a few years ago) I would be infuriated at the mismanagement, and I would go in and clean house.

Last edited by Hope Shimmers; 03-12-2017 at 05:56 AM.
Hope Shimmers is offline  
post #45 of 72 (permalink) Old 03-12-2017, 12:34 AM
Forum Supporter
 
Satya's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,598
Re: Oh, for Pete's Sake!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Affaircare View Post

"If you deliberately plan on being less than you are capable of being, then I warn you that you'll be unhappy for the rest of your life."

~ Abraham Maslow
Satya is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on Talk About Marriage, you must first register. Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

Important! Your username will be visible to the public next to anything you post and could show up in search engines like Google. If you are concerned about anonymity, PLEASE choose a username that will not be recognizable to anyone you know.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Marriage for the sake of it breeze General Relationship Discussion 37 03-27-2016 05:42 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome