Quote:
Originally Posted by joe kidd I believe a tattoo is a decision that should be made jointly. She knew he was against it and did it anyway. That is being selfish in my book. What I'm getting from this is it's not the actual tat but the fact she doesn't care what he thinks. Disrespect, plain and simple. |
Nope, not a joint decision. Sorry I disagree completely. That's me though. I have 6 of them...it's not disrespectful to have tattoos that your spouse doesn't like. I had most of those tattoos before he met me and he knew dang well that was my thing. He accepted that then, he can accept it now.
Same with OP - she already had a butterfly tattoo, it goes without saying that it was most likely she would get another as she already had one.
I don't think it's the tattoo. I think it's the "I was worried about the mortgage payment and she went and got a tattoo" THAT is where the disrespect comes from.
Her problem - lack of being able to prioritize. Not the fact she got a tattoo, the fact she got one when financially she should have either waited or discussed the financial repercussions.
If she can committ to a small infraction of financial "ruin" or discontent between her and her spouse what larger infractions is she willing to committ to.
A hobby or "fetish" aka desire should never superceed financial obligations and responsibilities. That is what prioritizing means.
Can't eat a tattoo, can't live under a tattoo (roof), etc etc.
Or as I say for prioritizing, have to have a house to have electricity, have to have electricity to have a fridge and stove to prep and eat your groceries, have to have a job to all of the above...and it goes on in that cycle. That is the true issue - lack of communication and prioritizing (it also shows in the lack of intimacy too).
Her resentment displays in the fact that she is showing off this tattoo in his face because he didn't "support" her irresponsibilities and lack of prioritizing.