Disagree. The Islamic radicals only need to get in one good mass attack to send our country spiraling. I subscribe to the better safe than sorry approach on this. We know they have infiltrated the refugee population, so it's foolish to let them in without a better vetting process.
Of course, we all cower in fear, hiding under our beds, afraid of our own shadows and pray the government cater to those fears by banning a few thousand immigrants from seven countries, which coincidentally Obama (remember the guy who wasn't doing enough) has been raining down drone strikes on for 8 years. So by your logic, we should also place bans on cars (which kill thousands of times more than terrorists), swimming pools, hospital stays, sex and any and all forms of human activities that could cause massive damage.
Or do you just not understand that even if we successfully stopped anybody (because anybody could be a terrorist from these countries) from coming in that it would not do one thing to stop a terrorist intent on wreaking havoc. As I said before, criminals don't comply with the law, that is why they are criminals. But disrupting everyone else's life is fine as long as YOU feel safer.
I have to ask, do you cheerlead anti-gun laws as well? Because you know, we just can't stand around with our hands in our pockets waiting for something to happen. In the meantime:
The annual chance of an American dying in a terrorist attack committed by a refugee is one in 3.6 billion