Reuters ran an article today
what actions are you talking about? Everything that is in the press is either been shown to be partisan BS or NOT illegal.
showing off their Trump Derangement Syndrome, and how some people around him (the only named one is Flynn) had 18 phone calls / emails and/or texts to or from people connected to Russia. They went on for 6 paragraphs before stating that according to all sources who've seen / listened to the conversations, nothing illegal transpired, there was no wrongdoing, or collusion. Paragraph 6 should have been in paragraph 1. All those words, just to build up more fervor, and try to bury reality under emotion.
I could re-write the article in 1 paragraph, and give it a pretty neutral summation:
"Sources from the intelligence community have informed Reuters that 18 conversations, emails or text messages were sent or received from/by people close to the Trump Administration. According to these sources, who have seen the text conversations, and listened to the phone conversations, no laws were broken and that there is no evidence of wrongdoing or collusion between Trump or his campaign and the Russians. The apparent topic of discussion was the hopeful normalization of relations between the US and Russia, and a desire to focus on common interests between the two powers, rather than focusing on the areas of foreign policy on which they disagree."
That's why I voted Trump right there. To not intentionally antagonize the Russians just because "her der her, dem Russians iz bad 'n we otta be against anyfin dey wanna do." To work with them when it's in our interest, and to oppose them when that's in our interest.
Sounds a lot smarter than "Let's make a no-fly zone over Syria and shoot down Russian planes because... well... because... Russians!" from Hillary Clinton.