The most the Russians did was hack DNC emails which then led to the light of day being put upon Hillary's campaign colluding with the DNC to rig the primaries. However it is not at all proven the Russians did that hack. There is more evidence pointing away from Russia than towards it.
Can you cite this verifiable evidence?
If the hacks led to Trump winning it wasn't due to any hacking of the election. No voting machines were hacked. The most one could claim is people saw the truth about Hillary and the DNC which led them to be sure to show up to vote for Trump.
To say the hacks were the reason Hillary lost is impossible to prove. What is easier to suggests, is that it was a factor.
We and every other significant country on the planet attempt to sway elections in foreign countries. I am not outraged as if this is some unique or sinister event, if there is proof it was the Russians. I think chances are 95% it wasn't the Russians.
I agree, we have done our own meddling and not always to our benefit in the long run. Nevertheless, we need to be concerned with those that do not have our best interest that attempt to manipulate our process, regardless of the end results or how much of a contribution the involvement lent to the overall process. I'm not outraged, but I am concerned.
I hope the investigation looks at the big picture, including Hillary's campaign, the DNC, and the RNC. Let's make this equal opportunity, not some cleverly crafted political hit job disguised as impartial.
As with any investigation, usually there is a narrowly defined objective. If in the process, their shows some ancillary evidence concerning the Hillary campaign, then by all means open up a separate investigation.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro