Very interesting turn lately. I say very similar and as a man get attacked/slammed. Just another A-hole man who just wants sex and fun. Interesting that when it's the other sex it is some how OK/justified. I especially have to laugh at the lists - that they are "better than" and want/expect/deserve more. But very past hot/prime for the unicorn that might qualify.
Men's "lists" get slammed because they are usually superficial and tend to be insulting towards women, and tends to be diametrically opposed, like "I want a woman who is a size two, but with J Lo's ass and Christina Hendricks' boobs, but I also want her to eat real food and not salads." Women like that literally DO. NOT. EXIST. Or they think they deserve to date supermodel type women, and won't accept or even consider anything less than a 10.
The lists here posted by the women can be distilled down to very simply, "have your **** together and don't be an *******." That's all it takes. Be a stable person and don't be a jerk, and most women will give you a chance.
Luckily for us, the men who make THOSE types of list generally fail at least one of these two criteria.
But these lists that TAM woman have posted here are also for screening for compatibility, and that's not superficial. Honestly, I have yet to see a man's list that isn't completely superficial. I'm not saying that all men are superficial, not by a long shot. It's just that the non-superficial men I've known either don't have lists, or haven't shared them.
ETA: the men's lists that get slammed also tend to objectify and dehumanize woman. That's what we object to. We don't object to a man having criteria in terms of who he will or won't be compatible with. We object to lists that treat us like cuts of meat instead of people.