The Impeachment of Donald John Trump - Talk About Marriage
Politics This is the place to discuss politics

User Tag List

 543Likes
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
post #1 of 534 (permalink) Old 12-19-2019, 11:36 AM Thread Starter
Member
 
arbitrator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Central Texas/Brazos Valley
Posts: 16,179
Cool The Impeachment of Donald John Trump

The U. S. House of Representatives voted to impeach Donald Trump on two separate articles of impeachment involving abuse of power and obstruction of justice!

So where do you think we go from here?



"To love another person is to see the face of God!" - Jean Valjean from Les Miserables

My Story!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
arbitrator is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 534 (permalink) Old 12-19-2019, 11:41 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Summerville, South Carolina
Posts: 72
Re: The Impeachment of Donald John Trump

Its a sham and the democrats are in a panic because he has the dirt on all of them. They just sealed his victory for 2020. They're all pedophiles and criminals. mark my words! they will all be either exposed or arrested. PAIN!!!

And this thread has nothing to do with Marriage
jakeskate is offline  
post #3 of 534 (permalink) Old 12-19-2019, 12:07 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,855
The Impeachment is ridiculous. The articles don't even allege any federal crimes were committed. Any President and future president could get impeached with their allegations. We would have endless sideshows of impeachments every time a President gets elected from a different party than the House.

And then Pelosi says she isn't going to send over the papers unless the Senate appoints hatchetmen of Democrats choosing to hold the trial. How? Why? She has no leverage to make such demands. There simply isn't a trial and he doesn't get impeached if the papers aren't sent. But I guess thats what she wants since it was never about proving a crime and removing him from office.
UpsideDownWorld11 is offline  
 
post #4 of 534 (permalink) Old 12-19-2019, 12:15 PM
Member
 
Marduk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 17,952
Re: The Impeachment of Donald John Trump

Quote:
Originally Posted by UpsideDownWorld11 View Post
The Impeachment is ridiculous. The articles don't even allege any federal crimes were committed. Any President and future president could get impeached with their allegations. We would have endless sideshows of impeachments every time a President gets elected from a different party than the House.
There were two charges. Perhaps you should actually read them before making the assertion that there wasn't?

Quote:
And then Pelosi says she isn't going to send over the papers unless the Senate appoints hatchetmen of Democrats choosing to hold the trial. How? Why? She has no leverage to make such demands. There simply isn't a trial and he doesn't get impeached if the papers aren't sent. But I guess thats what she wants since it was never about proving a crime and removing him from office.
You have two republican senators openly admitting they will violate their oath to remain impartial on the public record to support Trump no matter what he did. Pelosi is showing she's quite the strategist with this play - Trump can remain impeached, they can continue to investigate, and the Senate can do nothing until they provide at least the pretence of a fair trial.

As to where this will go, I don't think he will be removed from office. He may even get a second term if the GOP is as insane as they are acting.

But I do think he will either stand trial when he leaves office, or flee the country - which is what I actually think will happen. He now cannot be pardoned for his crimes while in office.

The GOP is going to have to deal with that for a very long time, especially if he gets re-elected.
Marduk is offline  
post #5 of 534 (permalink) Old 12-19-2019, 12:22 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 6,798
Re: The Impeachment of Donald John Trump

Quote:
Originally Posted by jakeskate View Post
Its a sham and the democrats are in a panic because he has the dirt on all of them. They just sealed his victory for 2020. They're all pedophiles and criminals. mark my words! they will all be either exposed or arrested. PAIN!!!

And this thread has nothing to do with Marriage
I'm a democrat and I'm not a criminal nor do I lust after underage people. That last person ousted from Congress for pedophilia was Dennis Hastert who IS a pedophile. In fact he was paying off one to stay quiet. Jim Jordan has been accused of taking a Joe Paterna role with the wrestling team at an Ohio university when has was an assistant coach. Who in the democraic party is a pedophile?

This thread was started on the politics section. You don't have to respond if you don't want to.
NextTimeAround is offline  
post #6 of 534 (permalink) Old 12-19-2019, 12:26 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marduk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by UpsideDownWorld11 View Post
The Impeachment is ridiculous. The articles don't even allege any federal crimes were committed. Any President and future president could get impeached with their allegations. We would have endless sideshows of impeachments every time a President gets elected from a different party than the House.
There were two charges. Perhaps you should actually read them before making the assertion that there wasn't?


Abuse of power isn't a federal crime. Its an opinion. Any President (past or future) is possibly guilty.

Obstruction of Justice? How? House made the rules absent a court order. Its unclear what power they even have to subpoena. Besides the President has wide discretion on what he can and can't comply with for national interest. He released the transcripts, he doesn't have to help stage his own witchhunt. Again, any President can fall into this article.

I don't think Democrats want this to go to trial as long as Biden is the front runner.
UpsideDownWorld11 is offline  
post #7 of 534 (permalink) Old 12-19-2019, 12:29 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 6,798
Re: The Impeachment of Donald John Trump

I forgot to make it clear that both Hastert and Jordan are Republicans.
NextTimeAround is offline  
post #8 of 534 (permalink) Old 12-19-2019, 12:31 PM
Member
 
Marduk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 17,952
Re: The Impeachment of Donald John Trump

Quote:
Originally Posted by UpsideDownWorld11 View Post
Abuse of power isn't a federal crime. Its an opinion. Any President (past or future) is possibly guilty.

Obstruction of Justice? How? House made the rules absent a court order. Its unclear what power they even have to subpoena. Besides the President has wide discretion on what he can and can't comply with for national interest. He released the transcripts, he doesn't have to help stage his own witchhunt. Again, any President can fall into this article.

I don't think Democrats want this to go to trial as long as Biden is the front runner.
Abuse of power, in the form of "malfeasance in office" or "official misconduct," is the commission of an unlawful act, done in an official capacity, which affects the performance of official duties. ... Abuse of power can also mean a person using the power they have for their own personal gain.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abuse_of_power


Obstruction of Congress:
Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1505
Marduk is offline  
post #9 of 534 (permalink) Old 12-19-2019, 12:48 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marduk View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by UpsideDownWorld11 View Post
Abuse of power isn't a federal crime. Its an opinion. Any President (past or future) is possibly guilty.

Obstruction of Justice? How? House made the rules absent a court order. Its unclear what power they even have to subpoena. Besides the President has wide discretion on what he can and can't comply with for national interest. He released the transcripts, he doesn't have to help stage his own witchhunt. Again, any President can fall into this article.

I don't think Democrats want this to go to trial as long as Biden is the front runner.
Abuse of power, in the form of "malfeasance in office" or "official misconduct," is the commission of an unlawful act, done in an official capacity, which affects the performance of official duties. ... Abuse of power can also mean a person using the power they have for their own personal gain.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abuse_of_power


Obstruction of Congress:
Whoever, with intent to avoid, evade, prevent, or obstruct compliance, in whole or in part, with any civil investigative demand duly and properly made under the Antitrust Civil Process Act, willfully withholds, misrepresents, removes from any place, conceals, covers up, destroys, mutilates, alters, or by other means falsifies any documentary material, answers to written interrogatories, or oral testimony, which is the subject of such demand; or attempts to do so or solicits another to do so; or

Whoever corruptly, or by threats or force, or by any threatening letter or communication influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due and proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States, or the due and proper exercise of the power of inquiry under which any inquiry or investigation is being had by either House, or any committee of either House or any joint committee of the Congress—

Shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1505
And none of that meets the constitutional demands of impeachment. Abuse of power isn't a federal crime by itself. There must be a federal law he violated.

And Trumps use of executive priviledge is not obstruction. Its a legal right of the president. Congress is not a law enforcement agency, they cannot investigate someone purely to expose wrongdoing or damaging information about them for political gain. Which is all this trial amounted to. And any subpoena must further some 'legislative purpose' per the Supreme Court.
UpsideDownWorld11 is offline  
post #10 of 534 (permalink) Old 12-19-2019, 12:51 PM
Member
 
OnTheFly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,780
Re: The Impeachment of Donald John Trump

So, when does Pence take over?

OnTheFly is offline  
post #11 of 534 (permalink) Old 12-19-2019, 12:56 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,855
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheFly View Post
So, when does Pence take over?
In 5 years. 🙂
UpsideDownWorld11 is offline  
post #12 of 534 (permalink) Old 12-19-2019, 01:01 PM
Member
 
Marduk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 17,952
Re: The Impeachment of Donald John Trump

Quote:
Originally Posted by UpsideDownWorld11 View Post
And none of that meets the constitutional demands of impeachment. Abuse of power isn't a federal crime by itself. There must be a federal law he violated.

And Trumps use of executive priviledge is not obstruction. Its a legal right of the president. Congress is not a law enforcement agency, they cannot investigate someone purely to expose wrongdoing or damaging information about them for political gain. Which is all this trial amounted to. And any subpoena must further some 'legislative purpose' per the Supreme Court.
1. it doesn't have to be, to be impeachable.

2. it was what Nixon was also going to be impeached for, so there's precedent.

3. Trump's use of executive privilege is unparalleled, and has not been tested in court. However, he can exercise this privilege and still be held in obstruction of Congress.

This is all misdirection.
Marduk is offline  
post #13 of 534 (permalink) Old 12-19-2019, 01:21 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: thinking outside the box, its quiet here
Posts: 922
Re: The Impeachment of Donald John Trump

Quote:
Originally Posted by UpsideDownWorld11 View Post
And none of that meets the constitutional demands of impeachment. Abuse of power isn't a federal crime by itself. There must be a federal law he violated.

And Trumps use of executive priviledge is not obstruction. Its a legal right of the president. Congress is not a law enforcement agency, they cannot investigate someone purely to expose wrongdoing or damaging information about them for political gain. Which is all this trial amounted to. And any subpoena must further some 'legislative purpose' per the Supreme Court.
What is that other co-equal branch of gov. called again ? The one that they have to use if
the President challenges their subpoenas. The one that includes the Supreme Court that has
agreed to decide if another court gets his tax documents. The one that includes the FISA
court which they got caught using unverified information with. The warrants that they got
were illegal once the source or sub source was proven to be just hearsay. FISA court has even issued a
statement about that. Hearsay evidence is a big part of this. Sonland changed or added to his testimony
but which is true ?

My ex daughter in law cheated on my son but she is one helluva lawyer!!
She would chew them up and spit them out quickly.

Never place anyone on a pedestal it hurts more when they fall off
sa58 is offline  
post #14 of 534 (permalink) Old 12-19-2019, 01:28 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: thinking outside the box, its quiet here
Posts: 922
Re: The Impeachment of Donald John Trump

I wonder if Trump has ever read

The Art of War,
Sun Tzu 5th century BC.

Never place anyone on a pedestal it hurts more when they fall off
sa58 is offline  
post #15 of 534 (permalink) Old 12-19-2019, 01:28 PM Thread Starter
Member
 
arbitrator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Central Texas/Brazos Valley
Posts: 16,179
Cool Re: The Impeachment of Donald John Trump

Quote:
Originally Posted by UpsideDownWorld11 View Post
The Impeachment is ridiculous. The articles don't even allege any federal crimes were committed. Any President and future president could get impeached with their allegations. We would have endless sideshows of impeachments every time a President gets elected from a different party than the House.

And then Pelosi says she isn't going to send over the papers unless the Senate appoints hatchetmen of Democrats choosing to hold the trial. How? Why? She has no leverage to make such demands. There simply isn't a trial and he doesn't get impeached if the papers aren't sent. But I guess thats what she wants since it was never about proving a crime and removing him from office.
Trump is already impeached and will always continue to remain in that most hallowed status along with Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton.

Until such time that the Articles of Impeachment are forwarded to the Senate by the Speaker and/or an administrative agreement between the House and Senate managers is reached, then Trump remains firmly indicted by the U. S. House of Representatives until such time that he can stand trial in the U. S. Senate.

"To love another person is to see the face of God!" - Jean Valjean from Les Miserables

My Story!
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
arbitrator is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on Talk About Marriage, you must first register. Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

Important! Your username will be visible to the public next to anything you post and could show up in search engines like Google. If you are concerned about anonymity, PLEASE choose a username that will not be recognizable to anyone you know.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome